Monday 20 April 2015

Art History / Lancret's A Cup of Chocolate 1742




A lady and a gentleman with two girls in a garden (the cup of chocolate): a material culture analysis
Hillary Curtis 
I do not think I ever took so much trouble to please or that I was ever so satisfied with myself…I was successively youthful and rational, playful and emotional, sometimes even wanton, and I pleased myself by considering him as a sultan in the midst of a harem in which I was successively the different favorites – Les Liaisons Dangereuses, 1782, Cholderlos de Laclos[1]

Choderlos de Laclos wrote these words for the Marquise de Merteuil in 1782, forty years after Lancret painted his beautiful picture.  But what these words allude to is the same ‘conspiracy of pleasing’, the same performance of identity, allusion, self-fashioning and the use of specific tools for this purpose which is central to the understanding of Lancret’s A lady and a gentleman with two girls in a garden (the cup of chocolate).[2]
Comparatively little has been written about the works on Nicolas Lancret.  When writing on his works appears it is most often in connection to his contemporaries. Whether the parallel being drawn be stylistically or thematically, he is most often raised on the writer’s journey to elucidating a larger argument about gardens, swings, Watteau, Fragonard or even images of Madame de Pompadour.[3] There has been studies that focus on him exclusively but these are limited.[4] Lancret deserves further consideration in his own right.
Certain motifs and/or elements occur commonly throughout his images. A certain stylized, inhabited, contrived garden scene which depicts small groups of young upper bourgeois or aristocratic ladies and gentlemen dressed in fine, brightly coloured textiles with powered faces and rouged cheeks, taking part in a social exchanges (singing, dancing, playing cards, taking hot chocolate, even starting a fire with a mirror: see Figures, 2 -12) often encumbering/occasioning the use of furniture or traditionally interior decoration such as a card tables, musical instruments or coffee and chocolate pots.  The garden’s similarity to those depicted on stage are striking and un-missable. The garden in these paintings occur as a theatrical background to the action that is taking place downstage.
Recent articles such as Byron Ellsworth Hamann’s ‘Interventions: the mirrors of Las Meninas: cochineal, silver and clay’ [5]and Natasha Eaton’s article ‘Nomadism of colour: painting, technology and waste in the chromo-zones of colonial India c. 1765 – c.1860’ [6] have demonstrated the fruitfulness of a taking a material culture studies approach to examining artistic works.  Hamann analysis examines three objects: the silver tray, a small red curarous that is placed upon it and red/pink cloth visible in mirror that has been dyed with cochineal.  These, he argues are objects, which are the products of Spanish colonial trade links and Amerindian labor,  signify and make present the otherwise invisibility of their makers and sites of their labor therefore readdressing a Las Meninas which has previously only examined the painting in terms of reception and representation in and of the sixteenth century Spanish court. Eaton conducts much the same endeavor in her own article in which she discusses the politics of production and consumption of certain colour’s produced in the subaltern during the colonial period.  Specifically, mummy brown, indigo and Indian yellow, the latter which in analyses particularly in its relation to and replacement of gold leaf.  These allow her to consider hidden (and yet physically highly visible) ‘layers’ of social historical meaning.  By investigating the production of indigo, for example, which entailed vast land clearing, the usurpation of food crop land for indigo production land, the conditions of treatment of workers in which their role transformed from a farm worker to machine like labors, she was better able to understand the significance of the military uniforms gaol clothes and art works in which it appears. Eaton’s article uses multiple art objects to make conjectures about the production and consumption of the epistemes of culture, place and space. These two articles represent the anthropological turn.  the investigation into the production and understanding of culture, place and space and space via the materials and objects that are depicted in and make up the artistic object and at the same time uncovering new dimensions to the artistic object via this process.  Both prove to be fruitful, Hamann in particular demonstrating a new presence – that of Amerindian labor – into an image that has usually only been examined within the context of the sixteenth century Spanish royal court.
Thus with the dual goal of a better understanding of both Lancret’s painting, A lady and a gentleman with two girls (the cup of chocolate) (subsequently to be known as The cup of chocolate) and to consider the merits of material culture line of inquiry into works of art in sight, it is that aim of the next few pages to examine the material objects that are present in The cup of chocolate. 
While it may not appear so at first glance the objects and materials available for study in this painting are numerous and varied; the child’s doll, the textiles – including those of the servant as well as the family, the dog, the porcelain, the silver tray, the silver coffee pot, the vermillion painted cheeks of the mother, the hot beverage being consumed and indeed even the garden that is after all as highly contrived as a theatrical backdrop.[7]  Not all of these objects and materials will be looked at here.  The following pages will be limited to the focusing on the coffee (chocolate) pot and its contents; the vermillion rouge of the mistress; and, finally, the garden space as a material object; specifically a theatrical backdrop and an extension of the tools exploited in the fashioning of identity.  The reasons for the latter will become clearer as the analysis of the first are considered.





[1] Pierre Ambroise François Choderlos de Laclos, Les Liaisons Dangereuses, 1782, trans. Richard Aldington, London and New York, 2011.
[2] Mimi Hellman term for the complex system of les bienséances in which individuals had to please others without appearing to please themselves, but to be pleased by the other’s pleasure at the same time as displaying a certain amount of reciprocal pleasure at their partners efforts to do the same.  An upmost naturalness and ease was to be expected during this whole time. Mimi Hellman, Furniture, ‘Sociability, and the work of leisure in eighteenth century France’, Eighteenth century studies, Vol.32, No.4 (summer), 1999, 415-445.
[3] Lancret’s images of ladies at their toilette are often mentioned in studies of these images.  The studies invariably focus on the numerous works that Boucher completed of this subject, and are often images of Madame de Pompadour. Lancret is also often cited in studies of Watteau. See Martin P. Eidelberg, Watteau, Lancret and the fountains of Oppenort, The Burlington Magazine, Vol. 110, No. 785 (august) 1968, 445 – 456 and also Donald Posner, The swinging women of Watteau and Fragonard, The art bulletin, Vol.64, No.1 (March), 1982, 75-88.
[4] Tavener Holmes, Mary and Joseph Focarino, Nicolas Lancret 1690 – 1743, New York in association with the Frick Collection, 1991.;Tavener Holmes, Mary and Mark Leonard, Nicolas Lancret: Dance for a Fountain, Las Angeles, 2006 are two such examples.  There is also a brief study of his drawings: Margaret Morgan Grasselli, ‘Eleven new drawings by Nicolas Lancret’, Master drawings, Vol.23/24. No.3 (1985-1986), 377-389 + 467-474.
[5] Byron Ellsworth Hamann’s ‘Interventions: the mirrors of Las Meninas: cochineal, silver and clay’, The Art Bulletin, Vol. 92. No.1-2. 2010.
[6] Natasha Eaton’s article ‘Nomadism of colour: painting, technology and waste in the chromo-zones of colonial India c. 1765 – c.1860’, Journal of Material Culture, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2012. P. 61- 81.
[7] See later section on the garden.

No comments:

Post a Comment